[Home]PoliceInteraction

RootPage | RecentChanges | Preferences | Upload

Showing revision 13
Difference (from revision 13 to revision 13) (minor diff, author diff)
(The revisions are identical or unavailable.)
Police usually interact with violence, sexist and racial prejudice.

Don't trust them :o)

There is various cops versions.

The Good Cop

"How about you talk, and we'll get you some better food and rights?"

The Bad cop

"My partner plays by the book. I don't. If you want your month to stay intact, make it talk!"

The Nietzchean cop

"There is no universal morality. Only will to power. And with that knowledge in mind, I have chosen to be an interrogator."

The MislavZugaj cop

"Depending on what how things are developing by Friday, I might organise invididual talks. But as always, your word above mine, there just has to be a word."

The MislavZugaj cop Part Two

"Don't upload *existing* images, content, memes, drawings, screenshots, art etc. on the wiki. All content must be of your own making. This allows for the upload of edits, and using/collaging found material, so there's plenty of flexibility.

But in general, it feels a lot easier to engage with content you yourself have provided: it asks a lot more of the viewer, and makes it more inviting to react to and collaborate. Just look at our (current) amazing parrot logo!

This is a hard, dictatorial assignment restriction."

The Dutch cop

"Sorry we don't have time and human resources to look into your case right now. You can object or hire a lawyer." [ACAB]

The Foucault Cop:

"Society is a cop, the individual is a prisoner"

The Žižekian Cop:

"The odd thing was that before the Police closed in on me, I was in fact offered what in that instant appears as a moment of wholly free choice. Without words and almost without images, a fact about myself was somehow presented to me. I became aware that I was holding something ajar, or shutting something out. Or, if you like, that I was wearing some stiff clothing, like corsets, image a full rioting gear, or even one of those things Elisabeth I used to wear, as if I were a steamed lobster. I felt myself being, there and then, given a free choice. I could open the door or keep it shut; I could unbuckle the heavy suit or keep it on. Neither choice was presented as a duty; no threat or promise was attached to either, though I knew that to open the door or to take off the corset meant the indeterminable. I am at a crossroads with no exit. The choice appeared to be momentous but it was also strangely unemotional. I was moved by no desires or fears. In a sense I was not moved by anything. I chose to open, to unbuckle, to loosen the rein. I say, “Yes officer, I did it,” yet it did not really seem possible to do the opposite. On the other hand, I was aware of no motives. You could argue that I was not a free agent but then does such a person really exists?, but I am more inclined to think this came nearer to being a perfectly free act than most that I have ever done. Close to. Necessity may not be the opposite of freedom, and perhaps a woman is most free when, instead of producing motives, she could only say, 'I am what I do.' Then came the repercussion on the imaginative level. I felt as if I were a woman of snow at long last beginning to melt. The melting was starting in my back—drip-drip and presently trickle-trickle-trickle-lickle. I rather disliked the feeling. "

RootPage | RecentChanges | Preferences | Upload
Edit revision 13 of this page | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited May 27, 2020 10:05 pm by 172.19.0.(logged) (diff)
Search: